Willie Walsh, CEO of British Airways parent company IAG, has publicly stated that he doesn’t believe a 3rd runway will be built at Heathrow.
The combative Irishman was speaking at a public evidence session, part of the Davies Commission into UK airport capacity.
Commenting on the issue Mr Walsh stated: “I suspect the recommendations by the committee won’t be acted on by politicians… I’m critical of the politics behind their decisions. This government gave no credible alternative to a third runway so BA will continue planning for the future on the basis of a two runway Heathrow.”
After the last Labour government gave the go-ahead for a 3rd runway at the UK’s busiest airport, the Conservative / LibDem coalition came to power with an agreement that no further runways should be built at Heathrow (which Labour too now agree with). Of course easy promises made in opposition (promises made largely because of the number of marginal, west London constituencies that lie under Heathrow’s flight-path) become more of a problem once in power. With Heathrow already operating at 99% capacity, and airlines, business groups and unions all calling for additional airport capacity, the government has done what all governments do……side-step the issue.
The Davies Commission, led by Howard Davies, one time Chairman of the Financial Services Authority (remember what a great job they did?) has been asked by the government to look into UK airport capacity and to report back in full in 2015, after the next general election. What was it Mr Cameron said about no more ‘dithering’?
The political situation takes on an added level of complexity because, in addition to Mr Cameron & Mr Clegg’s national political interests, on a purely London-level the Mayor, Boris Johnson, is one of the biggest opponents of further expansion at Heathrow. Could he too be mindful of his power-base in west London? Instead, he and his advisors have called for the buiding of a brand new, 4 runway, 24 hour airport to the east of London. Such an airport would clearly solve the capacity problem but would require Heathrow to close entirely, which in turn would devastate the local west London economy, requiring massive new investment, all at the same time that even more investment was required (probably £80 billion plus) to build the airport to the east of London and all the associated infrastructure – transport, housing, schools, hospitals etc. Thus far Mr Johnson has failed to explain who will be paying for this.
As far as British Airways are concerned, of course they would like additional airport capacity at Heathrow. Of course? With their 2012 takeover of bmi, British Airways now control almost 50% of the slots at the world’s single, most finacially lucrative airport. With no new runways, British Airways dominant position can never really be challenged, either by domestic airlines such as Virgin Atlantic, or large, foreign carriers such as those from the Gulf or USA. IAG might very decide that a secure, profitable, mid-sized British Airways will do very nicely thank you.
And the future for Heathrow? 2 runways, higher fares, more delays and less direct flights.